Subject: Re: hd tuning
To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3?= Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl>
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net>
List: port-i386
Date: 06/01/2003 11:07:07
> Cc: Micha=B3 Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl>,
>      Matthias Buelow <mkb@mukappabeta.de>, NetBSD-i386 <port-i386@netbsd.=
org>
> Subject: Re: hd tuning
>
> Wojciech Puchar [Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 10:47:41AM +0200]:
> > no one. but if you do, just stop posting such a nonsenses.
>
> The only nonsense I read here is that NetBSD runs faster, than Linux on
> x86 hardware (and no, I'm not talking about i486 with 8 MB RAM and 40 MB =
drive).
>
possible explanation is not using softdeps.

anyway - if you want to compare with linux you should use "async" option
to filesystem that will make filesystem as dangerous as linux in case of
crash/power off/reset.