Subject: Re: "real" OpenBSD compat - how hard would it be?
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
From: Alaric B. Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 03/20/2003 15:27:02
On Thursday 20 March 2003 14:59, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 04:38 AM, Alaric B. Snell wrote:
> > Can we ask 'em to fix this?
>
> I suspect that would be a largely fruitless effort.
/me wails and hides from the hatred that can only exist between two rival OS
projects, or maybe editors.
> > Or a tool to patch an OpenBSD executable to mark it as not being
> > NetBSD any
> > more by poking the magic number...
>
> This is probably a better solution. We could allocate a new a.out
> magic number that said "OpenBSD binary", and then write a small tool
> that adjusted the magic number of a binary appropriately. This would
> be trivial.
>
> But, as Roland pointed out, we're probably better off bootstrapping
> from a platform which uses a modern executable format, like FreeBSD or
> Linux (which use ELF, just like we do).
Yep, in this case, but for other binary compatability situations?
> -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
ABS
--
A city is like a large, complex, rabbit
- ARP