-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Nathan J. Williams" <nathanw@wasabisystems.com> writes:

> I was about to write the same thing, although it seems slightly
> kludgy; isn't fiber full-duplex by definition?

If you get right down to it, so is copper.  There is a transmit pair
and a receive pair.  It's the capabilities on each end that matter.  I
just know that from my 10baseT and 100baseT experience it's best to
hard-code both ends of permanent links, and if you hard-code one, you
MUST hard code the other.

I don't know what the hell the designers of the autonegotiation
protocol were on when they designed it...

- --Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
Comment: See http://www.flame.org/~explorer/pgp for my keys

iD8DBQE99i16l6Nz7kJWYWYRAgHzAJ9mN6h5F6klPCKOMxdcrM8JlgJQjgCfWYH8
7F76crnqDFcYfyhEn/qghM8=
=CwkU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----