Subject: Re: RAID 5 controller
To: Matt Herzog <mherzog@attbi.com>
From: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
List: port-i386
Date: 12/02/2002 22:22:43
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I like the 2400A. Yes, that's IDE, 4 channel, but for what you get
with 2 SCSI drives on the 2110S, you get 2x per disk and 4 disks on
the 2400A. Use shielded IDE cables if you don't want to trust the
ones that ship with the card.
anoncvs uses the 3ware controller (4-port) while ftp.netbsd.org uses
the hardware raid-5 assisted 8 port IDE controller. It fairly kick
ass, but unlike the Adaptec line, it isn't managable from NetBSD.
- --Michael
Matt Herzog <mherzog@attbi.com> writes:
> Hi All.
>
> I'm looking for suggestions as to which RAID 5 controller I should
> buy for a low-to-midrange database server. I guess the Adaptec 2110S
> is fully supported but I'd like to know if there are good or cheaper
> alternatives. I do want to stick to scsi.
>
> Any advice would be appreciated.
>
> --
> Matthew Herzog
>
> Powered by NetBSD :www.netbsd.org:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
Comment: See http://www.flame.org/~explorer/pgp for my keys
iD8DBQE97E2zl6Nz7kJWYWYRAhC3AJ4jpClEYWCcuZNoBBDSb3Mmqkc/agCeMjGO
60WcqIV+1wb5ZO2zyDA7+4M=
=ULJf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----