On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Alex Barclay wrote:

> Frank van der Linden wrote:
>
> >Anyway, in the meantime, I reshuffled the interrupt priorities a bit,
> >favouring serial interrupts more. Maybe you can try an updated
> >-current kernel and see if things are better now.
>
> Thanks for getting back to me - it seems that this was a _possibly_
> false alarm.

I was seeing "silo overflows" when doing "cvs update" over a dial-up
line on my 486, from 1.6F to 1.6J-2002-10-28 (and I never saw that on
1.5.2), but they're gone after updating the kernel to yesterday's
sources.

Frederick