Subject: Re: -march=i686
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net>
From: Sergio Jimenez Romero <TripleDES@eSlack.org>
List: port-i386
Date: 09/28/2002 02:18:41
--9IbvlJ)U=.bB'ueL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:06:18 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net> wrote:

> > Hi,
> >
> > > > 1.5.3
> > >
> > > OK. I think the gcc n 1.6 doesn't have this problem, but I don't
> > > remember all the details.
> >
> > Indeed, with gcc 2.95 you can safely use march=pentiumpro. I have a dual
> > pIII box here running 1.6_RC2 and everything was compiled with that
> > option. Works like a charm. Older versions of gcc like the one used in
> > 1.5.x have some bugs in the code generation part.
> this is what i have
> Using builtin specs.
> gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release)
> 
> and it MOSTLY worked. really few programs failed.
> and -march=i586 works without any problems as i use that on my pentium
> 
1.6 here, on AMD Duron 700 box, compiling all with -march=i686 and -mcpu=i686 without problems.

-- 
Do you BSD ?

< Gpg key at pgp.rediris.es > <TripleDES@eSlack.org>

HispaBSD - http://www.hipsabsd.org

--9IbvlJ)U=.bB'ueL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE9lPVmRfHqKtKhbFURAtLWAJoDOpTjwAgt2a9eIRzMzKUXnW5yNwCeI2gZ
RMoiELl3E/flNVt7i1Md0T8=
=4SUF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9IbvlJ)U=.bB'ueL--