Subject: Re: RAID on motherboard
To: None <port-i386@netbsd.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-i386
Date: 09/17/2002 10:29:37
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 08:18:47AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:

> BTW if you need RAID0&RAID1 only it needs almost no CPU power with
> raidframe, but 2 times more memory bandwidth for RAID1 writes.
> if you need RAID0 only use ccd(4)

I've read this advice more than once - but why? Our kernel RAID support=20
has also self-configuration after bootup - so I'd expect it to be a bit=20
more robust than ccd - or am I wrong?

Regards,
	-is

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPYbn7TCn4om+4LhpAQEctggAqFoOnujPtVpFgyVERMGFgPi/iRUChUZR
al4A3LsVg/q44OKB5ARqvMGSLzUdwz8YFwbDVKPQi/7BvUYULEXNlG3+qy0GlUU/
n1nZYvbHf7UgksekLBujGh964iO8nZKThYwiqznHb/dB0H+86CixApOPLo8Vdx9Y
q1rpcc3JeBvx1enetsBjC+FgJgWbh0dNq05ipxbPqnu9PX/uzTNSsWmzNZ+nnQn4
cz0nCaGbBMPgzhDaV43mUGAGBGdU4QMZ49piSfeznUEBzNR/ryQCZabC+7OpWDXp
T10QjyK6pgRvhAzhMM7rWtfaDvqXqcGFWvt6xomWS+nx//4X2qEf6Q==
=PLdU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--