Subject: Re: pkg_add mozilla ...?
To: John Franklin <franklin@elfie.org>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 08/29/2002 16:17:01
In message <20020829201450.GM5219@deathmitten.example.org>, John Franklin=
write
s:
>On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:06:32PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:01:07PM -0400, John Franklin wrote:
>> > network sources.) Similarly, does pkg_add take advantage of
>> > audit-packages if present? Say, you install a package from a CDROM
>> > that's old and has a security advisory on it. Pkg-add could allow i=
t to
>> > proceed (user selectable), but inform the user of the advisory via
>> > audit-packages.
>> =
>> It's much, much better to run audit-packages from cron. Because the pa=
ckage
>> isn't marked as vulnerable at pkg_add time doesn't mean it won't be a =
few
>> days later.
>
>I meant in addition to having it run via cron. The CDROM you've
>installed said binary package from may be many months old. The
>audit-packages db is less than 24hrs old.
>
As I said, pkg_add does this (for source packages, at least), by =
consulting the same file that audit-packages uses. Of course, that =
assumes that you have a current copy of that file.,
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com ("Firewalls" book)