> fabric between you and your seat for obvious reasons, though.
>
> The bottom line is that, fsck or no, FFS will be crazy-faster (and,
> apparently, useable versus not, in light of the mmap(2) brokenness
> in current LFS) than LFS for the expected and average usage pattern
> on /usr.
really? i tried LFS for /usr and it was at least not slower (IMHO little
faster)