On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:08:10PM -0500, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 03:18:25AM +0100, Feico Dillema wrote:
> > Hmmm, trying to get sshd to segfault remotely is not what I like to
> > do. I''ll try it when I get into my office again. Maybe tomorrow.
> 
> Heh. Fair enough.
> 
> You could just ssh in regularly and start *another* sshd (making use
> of the -p flag), of course. ;^>
Just drop by the office. sshd shows no sign of trouble here. started
sshd -d -d -d, and did a ssh localhost. That went just fine.

> Feico, are you able to make anything else spew bad free messages?
> Even ex seems okay on my system. Which suggests either that that
> change on 10/20 (I don't recall the details, but I'll investigate
I haven't noticed any other problems. Except for the bad free
messages, also vi seems to work ok. But I haven't done any heavy usage
testing...

Feico.