*doh!*

I suppose next time I should check to make sure I'm configuring interface
fXP0 and not fPX0.

Sorry for all the racket.

-Olu

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 10/09/2001 at 09:11 PM buhrow@lothlorien.nfbcal.org wrote:

>What does ifconfig fxp0 have to say?  
>I wonder if it's selecting the wrong media type for some reason.
>-Brian
>On Oct 10,  2:09am, "Olu Howard" wrote:
>} Subject: Re: Intel Pro/100S Dual Port NICs
>} Oh well there was that. :)
>} 
>} Unfortunately even after I tried reserving IRQ 5 & 10, I had no success.
>} Just be sure I both reserved the IRQs AND disabled USB.
>} 
>} No luck :(
>} 
>} I notice that the link light goes out as soon as the NICs are
>} probed/configured.
>} 
>} Any other ideas?
>} 
>} -Olu
>} 
>} *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>} 
>} On 10/09/2001 at 09:18 AM Chris Rupnik wrote:
>} 
>} >Well, I did notice that the USB is on irq 5?
>} >
>} >uhci0: interrupting at irq 5
>} >usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
>} >uhub0 at usb0
>} >uhub0: VIA Technologie UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
>} >uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
>} >uhci1 at pci0 dev 7 function 3: VIA Technologies VT83C572 USB
Controller
>} >(rev. 0x16)
>} >
>} >
>} >----- Original Message ----- 
>} >From: "David Brownlee" <abs@netbsd.org>
>} >To: "Olu Howard" <olu@serendipitynetworks.com>
>} >Cc: "Manuel Bouyer" <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>; <port-i386@netbsd.org>
>} >Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 5:06 AM
>} >Subject: Re: Intel Pro/100S Dual Port NICs
>} >
>} >
>} >> Just a thought, but do you have anything on IRQ5 - have you tried
>} >> setting that to 'isa legacy' or similar in the bios?
>} >> 
>} >> -- 
>} >> David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --
>} >> 
>} >>
>} 
>} 
>} 
>>-- End of excerpt from "Olu Howard"