Subject: Re: best NIC to make samba server
To: None <port-i386@netbsd.org>
From: Kazushi (Jam) Marukawa <jam@pobox.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 07/13/2001 16:12:07
Hi,
It's a truth that there are many chances that something make
the transfer speed slow. However, if it can be solved by
changing NIC, it's good news for a user, isn't it?
My configuration is very simple. Several machines connected
by a 100BT TX ether net switch. I had a hub at the
beginning. I changed it to a switch with a hope it may
solve the problem. I paid many bucks, and finally get an
answer, Intel NIC. It may nor work for others, but try it
first is good trial I think.
On Jul 13, 9:38, Jukka Marin wrote:
> Subject: Re: best NIC to make samba server
> Sounds like the samba clients are flooding packets to the server so fast
> that the server can't pick them up from the Ethernet card, so packets
> get lost and retransmission timeouts cripple the transfer rate.
Yes. It is very possible. My NetBSD server is slowest
machine. I never imagined I need fast CPU for only samba
server. However, if SAMBA works such a way, it's very
possible. I remember I had the same slow result while I was
using the same PIII 700 for the client and server, though.
I may remember wrongly.
On Jul 13, 10:07, David Brownlee wrote:
> Subject: Re: best NIC to make samba server
> Would it be an idea to tcpdump a 'good' and 'bad' card to confirm
> this?
Yes. I think it's a good idea to see what's going on.
However, I was not familiar about tcpdump. I was afraid I
may need fast 3rd machine to get all logs. So, I just
bought other NICs.
Is there any idea what I should log or check by using
tcpdump? I'd like to try, but do I need to log all?
On Jul 13, 20:10, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Subject: Re: best NIC to make samba server
>
> Other things may come in the game: hard disk controller, or
> PCI bridge. It's possible that HDD access block DMA for the network controller
> for too long. Linux would be less sensible to this because of its async
> filesystems.
Hmm, that's true. However, ftp works fine. I guessed the
use of file system from both servers are almost the same.
So, I didn't consider so deeply about the file system
issues. Moreover, Intel NIC works fine in the same
configuration.
> I have samba servers running on various machines, with various ethernet
> controllers and various motherboards; all of them performs as expected.
That's great information. Thanks. Hmm, if so, there should
be some reasons why mine doesn't work well but yours works
well... I hope tcpdump or something others show the
reasons.
Anyway, thank you for those inputs.
On the other hand, I received two private email messages.
One says he got Intel and it works fine. One says he has
the same slow problem, and will try Intel. I hope his try
goes well.
Regards,
-- Kazushi
Whatever is not nailed down is mine. What I can pry loose is not
nailed down.
-- Collis P. Huntingdon