Right the size is an argument and as well the complexity. Keep it simple
is best.
I agree as well with you guys
stefan

On Thu, 24 May 2001, David wrote:

> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 18:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David <neko@gencompprod.net>
> To: bsddiy@163.net
> Cc: Stefan Parvu <sparvu@cc.hut.fi>, port-i386@netbsd.org
> Subject: Re: jail FreeBSD
> 
> 	I would agree, I personally dislike FreeBSD, not only because of
> it's "fatness" but also because of it's simplicity and is never under the
> same organization for any longer than a couple years.  I like to look for
> challenges and FreeBSD wasn't where I wanted to be, NetBSD is somewhat
> challenging in many ways, lots of developmental ideas on about 60+
> platforms, very interesting, I hope NetBSD stays this fun and flexible.
> 
> David
> 
> On Fri, 25 May 2001, Xu Yifeng wrote:
> 
> > Hello Stefan,
> > 
> > Friday, May 25, 2001, 12:29:31 AM, you wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > SP> Do we have any plans to add jail (system call/admin) stuff in NetBSD ?
> > SP> Some ideas ? It looks good and it seems a faster approach than ACL of many
> > SP> SVID systems
> > 
> > 
> > SP> stefan
> > 
> > FreeBSD is fat, and is becoming a bloat ware, there is chroot and jail
> > and again ACL in kernel now, IPFIREWALL and IPFILTER, I think it's
> > dirty. NetBSD is clean and small, please don't make a mess of NetBSD.
> > NetBSD is most clean system in *BSD.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Best regards,
> > Xu Yifeng
> > 
> > 
>