Subject: CISCO AIRONET WIRELESS LAN CARD
To: None <port-i386@netbsd.org>
From: dkwok <dkwok@iware.com.au>
List: port-i386
Date: 05/25/2001 16:28:50
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0054_01C0E537.C812A140
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tossing over the idea of using Orinoco or Cisco Aironet 350.
The supplier told Cisco Aironet does not need to register the key and =
Orinoco does. Aironet seems to be more stable and easy to installed too. =
Any comment please.
David Kwok
------=_NextPart_000_0054_01C0E537.C812A140
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tossing over the idea of using Orinoco =
or Cisco=20
Aironet 350.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The supplier told Cisco Aironet does =
not need to=20
register the key and Orinoco does. Aironet seems to be more stable and =
easy to=20
installed too. Any comment please.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>David Kwok</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0054_01C0E537.C812A140--