Subject: Re: Confusing "current" versions of IPF (a.o.?)
To: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
List: port-i386
Date: 05/24/2001 20:49:13
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:57:17PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <v04220802b72ff5a6e664@[chilly]>, T@W <lsp93@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >1.some weeks ago I started to follow current by pulling in files from the
> >current 1-5 branch.
> >IPF build fine as version 3.4.16.
> >Then Darren Reed announced major flaws with "keep state" in e'y version
> >before 3.4.17, so I decided to pull in the total current branch with cvs in
> >the hope to find IPF-3.4.17 in there.
> >
> 
> 3.4.16 is the version in current, and it has the patches for keep state in
> it. This fix has not been incorporated in the upcoming 1.5.1.

Hum if I remember properly the 1.4 and 1.5 branches have the fix for
keep state/keep frags.

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--