Subject: Re: Athlon boards
To: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@wasabisystems.com>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 05/09/2001 13:34:02
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:06:54PM +0200, Frank van der Linden wrote:
> Btw, for people who are hesitant to buy an Athlon board with the
> VIA K*133 chipset, I noticed that, for example, Asus now has
> boards with a 266Mhz FSB featuring ALI, SiS and AMD 761 chipsets.
The SiS can run the CPU bus at 266 but doesn't support DDR SDRAM. :-(
The ALi has a reputation for dreadful performance.
The VIA only does about 10% better than their SDRAM chipset on memory
bandwidth benchmarks.
The AMD seems to be the way to go. I have the ASUS AMD761-based board
with a 1.3GHz processor, 512MB of DDR memory, and four UDMA/100 disks.
(Two disks are on a Promise card). I've had no IDE problems even
though the southbridge is a VIA 686B (I don't know of any actual
production board with the AMD southbridge on it :-( ). The board works
GREAT -- I get 90MB/sec of disk throughput (clearly, the problems I had
with PCI bus contention with other chipsets are gone -- beats me how!)
and huge memory bandwidth. I can build XFree 4 from scratch in about
half an hour.
The SiS chipset is interesting because it's really highly integrated
and it's dirt-cheap. It's a single IC with video, disk, and ether
interfaces included. Unfortunately XFree doesn't support the video
yet and the ether is probably the fairly low-performance "sip".
--
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
And now he couldn't remember when this passion had flown, leaving him so
foolish and bewildered and astray: can any man?
William Styron