On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 12:11:52AM -0700, Todd Whitesel wrote:
> > I've renamed the other three to append "-obsolete" and if no one defends
> > them by 0100 hrs 20010414-UTC (friday afternoon PDT, early saturday GMT)
> > then I'll remove them.
> 
> Done, except for 20010324, which has been cited as reproducing an otherwise
> hard-to-reproduce bug (lib/12164). If someone can verify that this bug exists
> in 20010407-1.5T, please let me know so I can purge 20010324-obsolete.

I just went to the more recent snapshot (20010407-1.5T, and the problem's
still there, so you can nuke the 20010324 snapshot.

+j
-- 
Jeff Rizzo                                         http://boogers.sf.ca.us/~riz