To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 09/29/2000 10:17:14
Wow, talk about a quick response!
JS> 3c509s, if you can find them reasonably priced. (i've
> seen still some on retail for just over $100, a top-of
> -the-line price from 1994 or so).
Now I'm confused (aren't I always? =o) Someone recently told
me that 3Com cards were great for DOS and MS-Windows because
they wrote good drivers for them, but were technically not
all they were cracked up to be - he didn't recommend them
I've used 3c509 NICs before, and I recall being told that
the 3C509b was better than the 3C509a because the former
would only interrupt when it received a packet meant
specifically for it, rather than for every packet received
which the latter apparently did. Can you confirm this?
For the record I can pick up the Realtek ISA cards locally
for US$ 20.
JS> If you go shopping for ISA cards, you're most likely
> to find some variety of ne-2000 clone or derivative.
> Many of these have some proprietary flavour of media
> control -- e.g., full-duplex, or switching between
> 10base2 and 10baseT).
On some of the earlier combo cards it was pretty simple to
switch between 10 Base-2 and 10 Base-T, you just set a
jumper. I /think/ with the Realtek cards that it was done in
the flash configuration program where you set base address,
IRQ etc. Is full-duplex usually a good thing on 10 Base-T?
JS> It's worse with PCMCIA, where support for 100Mbit
> modes or PHY i/o lines is also proprietary.
I don't think I'd want to attempt 100MB/s on a PC-Card
unless I was using Cardbus (32-bit PCMCIA). I may have
Cardbus, but I'm setting up 10 Base-T anyway.
JS> At least we have support for the Realtek cards ;)
Yep, and that's something I'm greatful for! =o)
Free email with cool domains at FriendlyEmail