[ On Friday, February 25, 2000 at 13:41:01 (-0500), Bill Squier wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: lm driver
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 11:08:55AM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> > 
> > btw, "lm" is quite some namespace pollution for my taste -
> > shouldn't this better be "nslm" or so?
> 
> That's fine with me.

National Semiconductor makes a whole line of chips with the prefix "lm",
not the least of which is the lm75 chip that sits off on an i2c bus and
provides more sensor inputs.  I don't know how may will ever need
drivers, but I'd bet it'll be more than one before long....  I think my
original suggestion of lm7x is more on-target.

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>      <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>