On Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:29:37 +0200 
 Hauke Fath <hf@Melog.DE> wrote:

 > So we're back to the issue that nobody in the NetBSD community maintains 
 > the SCSI sub-system in any way comparable to how, say, the LFS or the USB 

...I wouldn't exactly say that.

I have a load of changes I'll be committing very soon, with a lot more
to come.

 > or the VM code is maintained. I am currently looking at the SCSI tape 
 > driver because of QIC drive problems, and the claims of superior NetBSD 
 > code quality ring badly in my ears.
 > 
 > When are we switching to CAM?

We will never have the FreeBSD CAM code.  Its device model doesn't fit
into NetBSD's autoconfiguration scheme.  We will have some of the features
it has, though.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>