On 31.01.99, 13:48:20, drochner@zel459.zel.kfa-juelich.de wrote:
> 
> bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de said:
> > What irritates me is that there is a nanosleep man page, and the
> > message seems to indicate that the kernel knows about the nanosleep
> > function, but it is not (yet?) implemented. 
> 
> It is implemented as NetBSD syscall, only the Linux emulation
> does not know that it has to be called as Linux syscall #162.
> 
> A fix could be as easy as:

> [...]

That cured the problem, thanks a lot.

> 
> best regards
> Matthias
> 

-- 
Bernd Sieker

Windows. Just say No.