In article <199809171648.QAA19749@plucky.openg.ilx.com>,
Paul J. Lavoie <pjl@plucky.openg.ilx.com> wrote:
>
>Has there been any success with this? My attempts to use these libs, with the 
>directions found in compat_svr4, has been a annoying failure. The results of
>a 'ktrace' results in:
>`
>   481 ktrace   RET   ktrace 0
>   481 ktrace   CALL  execve(0xefbfd0d3,0xefbfcfc4,0xefbfcfcc)
>   481 ktrace   NAMI  "/emul/svr4/usr/bin/ls"
>   481 ktrace   NAMI  "/emul/svr4/usr/lib/ld.so.1"
>   481 ktrace   NAMI  "/emul/svr4"
>   481 ktrace   NAMI  "/emul/svr4/usr/lib/ld.so.1"
>   481 ls       EMUL  "svr4"
>   481 ls       RET   execve JUSTRETURN
>   481 ls       PSIG  SIGSEGV SIG_DFL
>   481 ls       NAMI  "ls.core"
>
>Trying to use ld.so.1 from a 2.4 patch found on the net provided more success, 
> as it actually gets some libraries loaded, but still death in the end, 
>probably due to library mismatches. I'm going to try Solaris 2.5 binaries 
>tomorrow once I get hold of the disk, but...
>
>Any suggestions would be welcome (such as working combinations)...

The 2.5 ld.so.1 works, the 2.6 does not. I tried to determine what is wrong,
but I need access to a 2.6 running system or the output of 
'truss -v all -r all -w all ls'

christos