Subject: Re: PCIC: PCI vs. ISA
To: Johnny C. Lam <lamj@stat.cmu.edu>
From: Ken Hornstein <kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
List: port-i386
Date: 08/26/1998 13:26:59
>It sounds like my BIOS isn't doing what it's supposed to, and I have
>to workaround it in the kernel. What's the best way to do this? My
>guess is that it shouldn't touch the MI code, and I should add a
>config option to set the IRQ for the controller. Would this be
>acceptable for submission?
I would _first_ try seeing if you have a setting in the BIOS for
"Plug and Play OS". If you do, try turning it off.
>In the process of providing a real MI PCIC PCI attachment, I looked at
>CardBus bridges and I think I can get those to work as
>i82365-compatible devices attached to the PCI bus, instead of
>configuring them through an ISA attachment. Is this desirable? I
>remember some people talking about getting real CardBus support into
>the kernel, so I don't want to encroach on someone else's project.
I was planning on doing some CardBus stuff myself; I'd certainly
try creating an i82365 PCI attachment (can't hurt), but I think the
CardBus stuff would be preferrable.
--Ken