Subject: Re: NOTE: Making UVM the default
To: Charles M. Hannum <mycroft@mit.edu>
From: Brian Buhrow <buhrow@cats.ucsc.edu>
List: port-i386
Date: 07/27/1998 13:46:07
	Has the problem with UVM and 386 processors been fixed?  
-Brian

On Jul 24, 11:06am, Jason Thorpe wrote:
} Subject: Re: NOTE: Making UVM the default
} On Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:18:12 -0400 (EDT) 
}  "Charles M. Hannum" <mycroft@mit.edu> wrote:
} 
}  > Unless someone knows of a remaining problem with UVM on the i386 port,
}  > I'm going to make it the default later today.
} 
} There is still a kmem_map usage problem on the x86, in particular with
} large memory systems w/ lots of swap.  The problem is worse when MFS is
} used, because of the large anon region it maps.
} 
} The intent is to solve the problem w/ the pool allocator, using a different
} map to map the pool pages... I'm currently working on one aspect of this.
} 
} Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
} NASA Ames Research Center                            Home: +1 408 866 1912
} NAS: M/S 258-5                                       Work: +1 650 604 0935
} Moffett Field, CA 94035                             Pager: +1 650 940 5942
>-- End of excerpt from Jason Thorpe