In article <6j28f8$prh$1@lotharon.endicor.com> tsarna@endicor.com (Ty Sarna) writes:
>In article <Esp31J.90@tac.nyc.ny.us>,
>Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com> wrote:
>> I just bought a ct 100, because
>> 
>> - 50ct screen is smaller and dual scan so it is not easy to work in
>>   a bright environment.
>
>Everything I read indicated it was an active matrix screen, not DS.  The
>big downer is that (at least for the US market), Toshiba apparently
>thinks up to 12 bad pixels in the LCD is OK.

Mine has two bad pixels on the 50 and 1 on the 100.

>Also, are you using that commerical X server, or not running X at all,
>or what?

XFree works on the 50, and I am trying to make it work on the 100.
Look in 

http://www.mnsinc.com/js/Neomagic.html

for the NeoMagic driver.
>
>> [other nice features of 100]
>
>You forgot:
>- costs ~4x as much :-)

That is how much I bought the 50 in August :-)


christos