Subject: Re: UVM stability [ Re: 1.3.1 upgrade question... ]
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
List: port-i386
Date: 04/21/1998 20:03:19
On Apr 21, Jason Thorpe wrote
> [...]
> my 256M AlphaStation 500.  The UVM kernel fared much better under this
> extreme memory load situation than the Mach VM system did (the Mach VM
> kernel went catatonic during two of four tries, and UVM kernel survived
> all four attempts).
> 

I also found UVM to be a few % faster than Mach VM on my i386 to build a
kernel (cyrix p166+, 16Mo RAM, ncr53c810 SCSI, kernel build with make -j3
under X window). 


--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--