On Apr 21, Mason Loring Bliss wrote
> Out of curiosity... How stable is UVM? How stable is -current in general
> right now? I'm itching to start tracking it again. (A related question:
> does top work with UVM? If so, does it exhibit the memory leak that seems
> to be pretty common after the VM changes that happened during 1.2-current?)

I'm trancking -current (with UVM on) on my home PC, which I use for
developpemnts (so it's mostly running X, vi and gcc :). Never got a
panic ...
However, I'm not sure I would run UVM on a critical server yet. Maybe
I'm too timorous :)
I would surely run -current/UVM on my desktop PCs and sparc at work too,
if I wasn't running INRIA's ipv6 stack on these machines.

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--