Subject: Re: Why doesn't the schedule prevent processes from taking the machine over?
To: None <port-i386@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Peter Simons <simons@rhein.de>
List: port-i386
Date: 02/17/1998 19:32:49
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Greg Wohletz <greg@duke.CS.UNLV.EDU> writes:

 > The short answer is that this isn't a CPU scheduling issue [...]

Thanks a lot for the answer.

Is there any chance that this might be "fixed" in future? I heard a
new VM system is in beta testing currently and I guess I am not the
only one who is slightly dissatisfied with this behavior.

	-peter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAwUBNOnX0Q9HL1s0103BAQGGZAP/aQupNCjk9XsWwIVTe2hNVa5V7bCp9YJp
mvdCoPp9QiU5hZnmUXImDfGk9TEPRZlXE3C0tGrLQvLDPGMlbMccocoNK9dLeDZp
E3gcYcrDEYrLZacse2Igs39cXDWNAAZF+WjicDdSy6alKGP9p1rtLGEalCc02aOb
lC9qEZTAfeo=
=qV0I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----