DIAGNOSTIC makes more sense, IMHO.

Chuck Cranor writes:
> In your letter dated Tue, 10 Feb 1998 09:09:01 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
> >: #if defined(DIAGNOSTIC)
> >:       printf("WARNING: corrected bogus mmap (pid %d comm %s)\n", p->p_pid,
> >:           p->p_comm);
> >: #endif
> 
> >Oh, so this is why I got all those messages when using a uvm kernel.
> >Shouldn't this message really be in DEBUG, not DIAGNOSTIC?  <g>
> 
> either way is fine with me.   my main concern is that it is easy to
> track down programs that rely on the old behavior so that they can be
> fixed.
> 
> chuck