Subject: RE: Upgrade experiences (i386)
To: 'Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no' <Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no>
From: Gunnar Helliesen <email@example.com>
Date: 12/31/1997 03:06:38
> > Here's an example: I had fetched the tar sets from the 'net and stored
> > them on a local disk. I only have the one disk (with three partitions: a
> > for root, b for swap and e for /usr) so I put them in /usr/distrib. When
> > I started the upgrade process I thought I would install from local disk
> > but then I got unsure. Where to mount it?
> This has been discussed earlier, and as far as I can tell there is
> now two menu entries in sysinst on the upgrade source:
> unmounted fs
> local dir
> The first one was earlier named something else, possibly "local fs"
> but with the same meaning, which was found to be somewhat confusing.
My question was: Can you upgrade NetBSD using tarballs downloaded to
either the root or usr partition of the taget disk?
My point was: The INSTALL doc doesn't say. It should.
If not, if you have to put them on another partition (or another disk),
where should you mount it? /mnt2? The INSTALL doc should say.
Never mind what I might or might not have read on port-i386 earlier
about this, I'm talking about how the INSTALL doc relates to reality for
someone who has never tried to install or upgrade NetBSD before.
IMHO a lot more handholding is needed in the INSTALL doc. Maybe it
should be split into several documents, MANIFEST, INSTALL and UPGRADE?
It's getting awfully long...
Thanks for listening,
Gunnar Helliesen | Bergen IT Consult AS | NetBSD/VAX on a uVAX II
Systems Consultant | Bergen, Norway | '86 Jaguar Sovereign 4.2
firstname.lastname@example.org | http://www.bitcon.no/ | '73 Mercedes 280 (240D)