> 
> On Dec 29,  2:29pm, John F. Woods wrote:
> > Subject: Re: doom "ported" to NetBSD
> > >        Since id has been kind enough to release the source for DooM
> > > we can now have a native binary of DooM.  I have compiled up DooM for
> > > i386 - it was very close to being a straight compile as the source
> > > released was for the Linux X windows version.
> >
> > Hmm, I wonder how many frames per minute VAXDoom would get on an 11/750...?
> > ;-)
> 
>    Shouldn't that be seconds per frame?   :^P
> 

No, I think he was right the first time....

-- 
Dave Burgess                   Network Engineer - Nebraska On-Ramp, Inc.
*bsd FAQ Maintainer / SysAdmin for the NetBSD system in my spare bedroom
"Just because something is stupid doesn't mean there isn't someone that 
doesn't want to do it...."