On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Ross Harvey wrote:
>  > [--- real wins on P5 performance ---]
>  >
>  > [ "John F. Woods" <jfw@jfwhome.funhouse.com> ]
>  > 
>  > Just make sure the 486 NetBSD users don't decide to roast you over a
>  > bonfire.
>  > 
> 
> 
> Well, *#$&# it.  It's bad news with a write-through cache. (486
> primary, most 386 board-level). I dunno how 486 board-level caches are
> organized, or even how common they are.  Maybe an #ifdef, or a dynamic
> selection?

	Sounds like a perfect thing to vary based on what cpu types
	are specified in the config file - if you do not have i486 or
	i386 then enable it, else fall back to more generic code...


		David/abs

  -- "Its hard to say it... I hate to say it... but its probably me..." --