NetBSD install kernels should see ed cards at:

ed0     at isa? port 0x280 iomem 0xd0000 irq 9  # WD/SMC, 3C503, and NE[12]000
ed1     at isa? port 0x250 iomem 0xd8000 irq 9  #   ethernet cards
ed2     at isa? port 0x300 iomem 0xcc000 irq 10

	any of the above three settings should work.

	There is a DOS based setup program - set the jumper settings to
	'soft' and then run the program. If you dont have a copy you
	_might_ be able to download one from the SMC website, but its
	too sluggish to tell from here.. :/

	Good luck!

                David/abs               abs@anim.dreamworks.com

    --- Oxycodone (Percocet) is definitely great stuff...  However on ---
    --- balance its not worth having wisdom teeth extracted to obtain ---

On Wed, 16 Apr 1997 wonko@madness.tmok.com wrote:

> ok, i've gotten my disk labeled, filesystems are on it as well as a kernel.
> i can boot right off the HDD now. (WOO HOO!!!)
> 
> i seem to be having trouble with my SMC Elite16 Ultra, the install manual says
> i need to have it on IRQ 2 to be able to use it with the pre-fab kernel, is this
> really right??  IRQ 2 is the cascade IRQ, which breaks everything above IRQ 8,
> which is bad, that's where the adaptec is located. (don't ask)  any pointers on
> gettint the pre-fab to see the SMC at an alternate place? (IRQ 10 - IO 0x280 
> would be real nice, that's where it is now)  to top it off, i halted NetBSD so
> i could bring Linux back up so i could talk to the world, the SMC descided that
> during all that is was going to change to IRQ 3!!!!  it took me a while to 
> figure out why my second serial port (the one with the 16550AFN) wouldn't work.
> pppd died.  stupid hardware, why do i keep PCs in the house anyway, it's bad
> luck.  (i seen to have much better luck with SUN hardware)
> 
> for all of those interested, the Hayes ESP, IRQ problem is a Linux problem. 
> the card is set to IRQ 5, NetBSD sees it as IRQ 5, linux refuses to see it as
> anything but IRQ 4, stupid fscking Linux.
> 
> it's been one of those days.  *sigh*
> 
> -brian
> 
> -- 
> The fundamental difference between Unix and the Macintosh operating system is
> that Unix was designed to please programmers, whereas the Mac was designed to 
> please users. (Windows, on the other hand, was designed to please accountants, 
> but that's another story.)
> 				--The UNIX-HATERS Handbook
> 
> === End Transmission ===
>