Terry Lambert writes:
> > No you aren't missing anything.
> > 
> > Furthermore, he is claiming that breaking compatibility with existing
> > code and scripts doesn't matter, either, in order to get this
> > "improvement".
> 
> What about "semantic seperation of command names from the FS on which
> they are intended to operate"?

Yup, Curt, you weren't missing anything at all.

Perry