Subject: Re: dump for MS-DOS partitions.
To: None <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
List: port-i386
Date: 03/24/1997 18:35:21
> > > ftp://ftp.cyber.com.au/pub/unix/msdump.tgz
> >
> > Better name it `dosdump'? Remember, there's more DOSes than just M$.
> > Also, we do already have a mkdosfs(8), maybe somebody would even write
> > a dosfsck(8). (mkdosfs doesn't understand harddisks however. I'm not
> > the right person to ask for this, my DOS knowledge is too weak.)
>
> ..actually... I'd suggest a naming scheme that NetBSD is using:
>
> newfs_msdos
> fsck_msdos
> mount_msdos
> dump_msdos
>
> The name is, of course, the string used to identify the file system
> in the vfssw[].
>
> Just a suggestion :-)
Curious: why aren't they using it as a prefix instead of a suffix? It
would seem to make more sense as a prefix, for all sorts fo string
manipulation reasons, including argv[ 0] and _ replacement with 0
for string split issues...
Is it just that SVR4 does it with prefixes, and NIH rules?
Terry Lambert
terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.