Subject: Re: dosemu/doscmd for -current; which and how?
To: None <jfw@jfwhome.funhouse.com>
From: Mister Gandalf <mgandalf@Mentasm.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 01/26/1997 14:21:37
On Sun, 26 Jan 1997 13:29:46 -0500,
"John F. Woods" <jfw@jfwhome.funhouse.com> wrote about Re: dosemu/doscmd=
 for
-current; which and how?:
> > The dosemu and doscmd packages on ftp.netbsd.org are from mid-Octobe=
r; does
> > anyone have either one running under -current, and what changes are =
needed
> > (if any)?  Which one is better (or, since that question is very like=
ly
> > meaningless, what are the guidelines for figuring out which fits a g=
iven
> > application better)?
>=20
> It turns out that doscmd runs under a straight 1.2 or -current kernel,=
 which
> pretty much settled the question for me.
>=20
> Or rather, it would have run under a straight kernel if setting "optio=
ns VM86"
> were sufficient.  After a great deal of fiddling around, I eventually
> discovered that sys=5Fmachdep.o wasn't getting recompiled to enable th=
e
> appropriate new system call...  grrr.
>=20
>=20

That's where a "make clean" comes in handy..

-- Mister Gandalf.

------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
              Straight from the FOREVER crashing computer!

                              Mentasm FTP
                     =20     HTTP coming soon!
              A3000, 68040/40mhz, 54megs, 3.1gig, Ethernet

                  CLCHAT SERVER!  us4.clchat.vapor.com

                         Mac, Unix, PC, Amiga
------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--