-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Reynolds <scottr@Plexus.COM> writes:
    Scott> That's preciely the problem.  ELF doesn't (currently)

  This suggests that there might be a way to do this? 
  I would have no problem "stamping" my Linux binaries with some
program that adds the right tags.

    Scott> is that if you have an ELF executable, it uses the SVR4
    Scott> ABI.  Currently we attempt to hack around this limitation
    Scott> by looking for clues that the binary might have been built
    Scott> for a Linux system, but as Jason pointed out, those clues
    Scott> aren't always there.

  Linux has iBCS support. Does it also have SVR4 support? If so, how
does it distinguish things? Or has the Linux ELF ABI simply become a
superset of SVR4 ABI?

   :!mcr!:            |  Network security consulting and 
   Michael Richardson |      contract programming
 WWW: mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca. PGP key available.




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQBVAwUBMrnC/dTTll4efmtZAQEs4AH/WONcPElW07DlxrvPKLogMc+gWihda7tV
8nwTFx+TCBVLNKyvW8gGuJSTebLdGYJ3LIa9zb7gcjr1Jg6WAiTNow==
=bCSk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----