Subject: Re: Post.Office + NetBSD
To: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@ux2.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
From: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
List: port-i386
Date: 11/08/1996 12:54:15
Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@ux2.sp.cs.cmu.edu> writes:
> There are probably several solutions to this problem. One, which was
> taken by BSDI for their SCO emulation, is to write and build libraries
> which look and act sufficiently like the target OSes' libraries that
> emulated binaries can't tell the difference. For commercial systems
> which are claiming binary emulation capabilities, this is necessary;
> they can't limit their capabilities' usefulness to the set of binaries
> and people mentioned above.
I agree this would be a nice and _useful_ thing, but currently this is
not done. If someone wanted to take up the task of getting a group
together and write such a beast I'm certain no one would complain...
> I think it's inappropriate that NetBSD trumpets its commercial-system
> binary emulation capabilities so loudly when it falls so far short of
> actually providing useful and complete emulation for those systems.
I don't. We _do_ emulate SCO, BSDI, etc. I use BSDI's netscape version
all the time. It works perfectly (well, as perfectly as Netscrape can...)
so I claim the binary compatibility is working.
--Michael