Subject: Re: AMD 586 dx4 133 support
To: Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net>
From: Sean Berry (most of the time) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/10/1996 22:02:34
(sorry, no references)
>To followup to my own post... As I posted in another message...
>On the other hand, in spite of the speed improvements, my simple
>Pentium 120 blows the doors off my 5x86-133. So, keep things in
>perspective. The 5x86 is a good cheap upgrade for an existing old 486
This is a difficult call. I picked up the CPU and MB, with a 16M stick for
less than $350 (don't remember exactly), which I considered a deal at the
If you'd like a faster CPU, but would rather split some of the budget out
for a nice PCI 2M video card, or a nicer mouse, or a quadspin CD, these
aren't a bad choice. (And AMD's 5k86 line screams)
>If you're going to buy new, definitely avoid the 5x86 (486) parts and
>head straight for Pentium (or P6). If you're on a really tight
>budget, try to find a closeout-special on a Triton-1 board and a P100.
>Even that will be way faster than a 5x86-133.
Out in the sticks, (Iowa) the 5x86 has been a nice upgrade for several of my
machines with money invested in nice VLB video.
In the first case, I was given $1200 to spread across six machines, and get
the max yield. Result: almost doubled everyone's memory, and the /33s went
to /160s, rather than buy -one- low end P5/75.
And my experience has been that for heavy math, (Usually FFTs) the 160s run
roughly as fast as the P5-90s. You could do worse.
>(My P120 is an Asus P55TP4N [Triton-1] board.)
Must be nice. :)
Sean Berry is a computer scientist trapped in an engineer's mind.
I imagine someone is likely to misinterpret my opinions as those of my
various employers. This is not the case.