Subject: Re: bug in fd.c?
To: John M Vinopal <email@example.com>
From: Charles M. Hannum <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/30/1996 15:49:38
John M Vinopal <email@example.com> writes:
> It appears that fd will possible return a negative byte count upon error
> I base this on fd.c: unmodified: line 579 of 1264 [45%]
> It would appear that b_resid is not always initialized in fd.c (but in truth
> I don't know enough of the deeper kernel world to assert this).
Yes; that appears to be the case. I'll check in a fix for it right
> Do I possess head in butt?
Nope. Looks like I did. B-)