Subject: Re: bug in fd.c?
To: John M Vinopal <banshee@gabriella.abattoir.com>
From: Charles M. Hannum <mycroft@mit.edu>
List: port-i386
Date: 08/30/1996 15:49:38
John M Vinopal <banshee@gabriella.abattoir.com> writes:
>
> It appears that fd will possible return a negative byte count upon error
>
> I base this on fd.c: unmodified: line 579 of 1264 [45%]
>
> [...]
>
> It would appear that b_resid is not always initialized in fd.c (but in truth
> I don't know enough of the deeper kernel world to assert this).
Yes; that appears to be the case. I'll check in a fix for it right
now.
> Do I possess head in butt?
Nope. Looks like I did. B-)