Subject: Re: pcvt problems
To: Nathaniel D. Daw <ndd2@columbia.edu>
From: J.T. Conklin <jconklin@netcom.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 07/30/1996 08:51:50
> The problem with the pcvt25h termcap entry is not in the entry but in
> the tset program; there is a buffer in there that is 1k and needs to be
> expanded to 2k to accomodate the whole pcvt25h entry. This has been
> outstanding (and the patch known) for months and months, as I posted the
> same question around the time 1.1 came out; I was surprised recently to
> discover that the change still hasn't made the tree. You can either
> figure out the right patch -- I don't remember it exactly -- or just use
> the vt220 termcap entry as a workaround instead and agitate for the
> patch to be committed.

I believe the problem has been fixed in a different (more generic) way, 
which is why you haven't seen changes to the tset program itself.

	--jtc