Subject: Re: Boot blocks croak on kernels with full debug table
To: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@UX2.SP.CS.CMU.EDU>
From: Craig Metz <cmetz@inner.NET>
List: port-i386
Date: 05/22/1996 12:23:40
In message <28828.832781218@UX2.SP.CS.CMU.EDU>, you write:
>As far as I know, 4.4-Lite didn't actually load symbols. I doubt that
>BSD/OS loads them, as well.
Neither look like they do.
>NetBSD actually does load the symbols into memory, and even keeps them
>there if you have DDB enabled.
Ok, I didn't know this. Does this work with KGDB? (and, for that
matter, is it just me, or is KGDB not really in the i386 port?)
>In any case, I agree with you that the boot block shouldn't
>arbitrarily lose. It should either work properly or determine that it
>cannot, and if it makes that determination should do _something_ sane...
Exactly.
-Craig