Subject: Re: Pentium gcc patch
To: John M Vinopal <banshee@gabriella.resort.com>
From: Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com <michaelv@HeadCandy.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 04/20/1996 12:09:30
>I patched the direct 2.7.2 source tree, ran the gcc-to-netbsd script
>on the tree, and then did a diff against the netbsd 2.7.2 gcc to find
>the few files where people have done other modifications (why?).
>I could tar the tree if anyone else wanted to play with pgcc on their
>pentium box.

Are these the patches Intel developed then kept proprietary for
awhile?  If so, you might not need a Pentium.

If I remember right, Intel claimed that the Pentium improvements in
the compiler also ended up actually speeding up code on a 486, as
well.  That might be worth trying out.

It might also be worthwhile trying this out on a Cyrix M1/6x86, and/or
an AMD K6 when it comes out.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Michael L. VanLoon                                 michaelv@HeadCandy.com
        --<  Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x  >--
    NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3,
               Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX...
    NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------