Subject: Re: Progress on this bug ?
To: None <port-i386@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 04/02/1996 20:46:04
>From: Tim Liddelow <tim@cst.com.au>
>Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 08:42:14 +1000 (EST)

>Yes, my mistake.  I thought I had done an "unlimit stacksize" .. I hadn't.
>However, limit stacksize 1024 causes IOT traps (atleast with 'ls').  Is
>that normal ?

Try using "limit stacksize 1024k" instead.  If you don't append the
'k', then it thinks you want a 1024 *byte* stack limit. :-)
-- 
Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>     <URL:http://www.shore.net/~mikel>
VLSI Design Engineer         finger mikel@shore.net for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division          CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA       (eq (opinion 'ADI) (opinion 'mike)) -> nil