> 
> What's difficult about "options NMBCLUSTERS=1024"? Works perfectly on my
> 64 MB machine when doing heavy NFS traffic.
> 

We have found this not to be the case, currently we are using:

options         NKMEMCLUSTERS=10240
options         NMBCLUSTERS=6144

This is on a www cache box that sees load averages in the 100's, we are 
building a new box with 2 ethernets and 2 scsi buses at this time, and we had 
to tweak these settings alot to get good results.

> I agree though that extending the mb_map statically is a hack.
> It should be changed to a more dynamic way of doing things.

Most definetly.

Regards,
Neil.

--
--  neil@domino.org                     Domino: In the glow of the night.  --
--  Free your computer and your <a href="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">mind</a>  --
----------------  NetBSD: The best things in life are FREE!  ----------------