Subject: Re: atapi cdrom drivers
To: None <bouyer@lix.polytechnique.fr>
From: Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 11/20/1995 11:24:52
>From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@lix.polytechnique.fr>
>Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 13:55:12 +0100 (MET)

>wdc0    at isa? port 0x1f0 irq 14
>wdc1	at isa? port 0x170 irq ?
>wd* at wdc? drive ?
>atapibus* at wdc?  #one atapibus per controller
>acd* at atapibus? drive ?   #The atapi cdrom, could be other devices

>Any comment/suggestions ?

I think 'atapibus' is redundant.  'scsibus' is necessary because the
SCSI protocol is standardized but the I/O interface is not.  IDE (also
EIDE and ATAPI) standardize both the protocol and the I/O interface.
-- 
Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>           http://www.shore.net/~mikel
VLSI Design Engineer         finger mikel@shore.net for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division          CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA                assert(*this!=opinionof(Analog));