You wrote: 

>Today it occured to me that we could quite easily (hopefully) support
>deletion of these extra entries. I'm going to look into that when I'm 
back
>from vacation (which is in two weeks).
>
>That way we would at least be able to fully support the Win95 
partition
>without destroying its consistency, albeit without support for the 
long
>filenames in our implementation.
>--

I thought the Windows 95 did not support multi-partitioning?  Is this 
true?  If so, why bother?

Kang