Subject: Re: Have DOS and NetBSD disk?
To: Phil Knaack <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: VaX#n8 <email@example.com>
Date: 07/20/1995 00:07:23
Okay, I'm catching up on mail. Sue me. :)
While really really bored, Phil Knaack wrote:
> I'm currently using OS-BS 2.0 beta 8 .. (and HOW long has it been
> 'beta'? :) and it works well. Unfortunately, I think OS-BS 2.0 uses
> a little more of the disk than the previous version; i.e., I have been
> unable to get a NetBSD disklabel and OS-BS to exist at the same time.
> If I disklabel the disk in order to access my DOS partitions from
> netbsd, it nukes OS-BS and will no longer boot. If I then reinstall
> OS-BS it nukes the disklabel and I can no longer access the DOS
> partitions from NetBSD.
> My question is this: would bteasy work better for me? Can anybody
> confirm this nifty annoying property of OS-BS?
I believe you have your partitions set up improperly.
Mine look like:
part'n 0: sysid 6 (MSDOS) : start 32, .... (0:1:1) (c:h:s)
part'n 3: sysid 165 (NetBSD) : start 372736, ....
Note that I leave a whole track for the boot manager. The secondary bootstrap
and disklabel stuff is done into your Unix "a" partition... that is, way away
from the beginning of the disk - in my case, 372736 sectors in.
What may be confusing you is that certain utilities will write "default"
stuff occasionally. I personally goofed several times over not providing
-B to disklabel at the same time I am writing the label with the -w option.
I intend to write a doc on this one day. In fact, it's almost done :)
VaX#n8 (vak-sa-nate) - n, CS senior++ and Unix junkie - firstname.lastname@example.org
Deal with evil through strength, yet encourage good through trust. - PGP me