Subject: Re: RAM probing .vs. CMOS values
To: Andrew Gillham <gillham@andrews.edu>
From: Mark F Willey <willey@ecn.purdue.edu>
List: port-i386
Date: 05/24/1995 10:25:15
"In a previous message, Andrew Gillham wrote:"
>
> I have 2 Dell EISA machines with > 16MB, but NetBSD only
> sees 16MB. The problem is that the CMOS extended memory
> values are incorrectly updated on the Dell. I complained
> to Dell, and their response is attached below. Basically
> it looks like the correct way to do it is to probe for
> the actual RAM instead of trusting the CMOS. I notice
I have the same problem on my Gateway 2000, circa several years ago. I had
to disable shadow BIOS. It wasn't just the OS that couldn't see the extra
RAM - the BIOS couldn't see it unless it was non-shadowed. I suppose
shadowing the BIOS and then actually probing for memory would be the best
solution for me. If I make progress, I will let you know.
<from your .sig>
> Resume -> http://www.cs.andrews.edu/~gillham/resume.html
A subtle hint to your employers??? ;-)
Mark