On Tue, 29 Apr 1997 01:35:19 +0930 
 mike smith <miff@spam.frisbee.net.au> wrote:

 > Is this supposed to work at the moment?  I've been trying
 > to do this for some days now, and am seeing odd things like :

...First of all, make absolutely sure that your compiler is up-to-date.

Secondly, are there any error messages from the disk, or whatever?  I
have been doing LOTS of builds on my Very Current hp380, and haven't
seen anything like this at all.

 > 
 > cc -O -DNLS -DYP -DLIBC_SCCS -DSYSLIBC_SCCS -D_REENTRANT
 > -I/local0/NetBSD/src/lib/libc/include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE
 > -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -DFLOATING_POINT  -Werror  -c -pg
 > /local0/NetBSD/src/lib/libc/time/localtime.c -o localtime.po
 > cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6
 > 
 > and 
 > 
 > cc -O -DNLS -DYP -DLIBC_SCCS -DSYSLIBC_SCCS -D_REENTRANT
 > -I/local0/NetBSD/src/lib/libc/include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE
 > -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -DFLOATING_POINT  -Werror  -c -fpic -DPIC
 > /local0/NetBSD/src/lib/libc/yp/ypprot_err.c -o ypprot_err.so
 > building shared c library (version 12.14)
 > *** Error code 1 (continuing)
 > *** Error code 1 (continuing)
 > *** Error code 1 (continuing)
 > ld -x -Bshareable -Bforcearchive  -o libc.so.12.14 libc_pic.a 
 > ld: libc_pic.a: No such file or directory
 > 
 > and
 > 
 > cc -O -D_MULTI_LIBM -D_POSIX_MODE  -Werror  -c
 > /local0/NetBSD/src/lib/libm/src/e_j0.c
 > /var/tmp/cc022318.s: Assembler messages:
 > /var/tmp/cc022318.s:544: Error: Spurious digit 5.
 > /var/tmp/cc022318.s:544: Error: Rest of line ignored. First ignored
 > character is `1'.
 > /var/tmp/cc022318.s:651: Error: Rest of line ignored. First ignored
 > character is `C'.
 > /var/tmp/cc022318.s:663: Error: Rest of line ignored. First ignored
 > character is `A'.
 > /var/tmp/cc022318.s:683: Error: Rest of line ignored. First ignored
 > character is `^'.
 > /var/tmp/cc022318.s:693: Error: Rest of line ignored. First ignored
 > character is `C'.
 > 
 > etc.  I had to build make(1) out of sequence, as I was/am
 > bootstrapping up from the latest snapshot.  Are there other
 > things I should be pulling up too?
 > 
 > Or is 'make build' deeper magic again?
 > 
 > --
 > Mike Smith  *BSD hack  Unix hardware collector
 > The question "why are the fundamental laws of nature mathematical"
 > invites the trivial response "because we define as fundamental those
 > laws which are mathematical".  Paul Davies, _The_Mind_of_God_

Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                               Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6                                          Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                                Pager: 415.428.6939